Vehicle Flame Throwers

Moderators: Vis Bellica, Laffe

User avatar
Truscott Trotter
Posts: 8788
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 11:11 pm
Location: Tasmania the Southernmost CoC in the world

Re: Vehicle Flame Throwers

Post by Truscott Trotter »

Peter wrote: Sat Sep 11, 2021 6:26 pm In this case we are talking about hits to a flamethrower AFV itself, not the target.
Unless he's talking about flaming the flammer? :P
Poetic justice...... :lol:
User avatar
Iztvan
Posts: 181
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2018 7:04 am
Location: Göteborg, Sweden
Contact:

Re: Vehicle Flame Throwers

Post by Iztvan »

Munin wrote: Fri Sep 10, 2021 4:49 pm
Iztvan wrote: Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:52 am Bailing out with one less shock comes to mind? I.e. 2 shock for most vehicles.
Minor note: you need to exceed the morale level of a vehicle to cause a bail-out. For most vehicles commanded by a JL, it takes 4 Shock to make the crew bail. But yes, only needing 3 Shock to cause the crew to bail out of a vehicle full of jellied gasoline sounds like a pretty reasonable house rule.
Oh, not so minor, thanks for spotting that!
Twitter @Staffan_G
Slynx
Posts: 123
Joined: Wed Aug 28, 2019 9:01 pm

Re: Vehicle Flame Throwers

Post by Slynx »

Iztvan wrote: Mon Sep 13, 2021 8:22 am
Munin wrote: Fri Sep 10, 2021 4:49 pm
Iztvan wrote: Thu Sep 09, 2021 8:52 am Bailing out with one less shock comes to mind? I.e. 2 shock for most vehicles.
Minor note: you need to exceed the morale level of a vehicle to cause a bail-out. For most vehicles commanded by a JL, it takes 4 Shock to make the crew bail. But yes, only needing 3 Shock to cause the crew to bail out of a vehicle full of jellied gasoline sounds like a pretty reasonable house rule.
Oh, not so minor, thanks for spotting that!
But as all flamethrowers shock is doubled, its really only two shock you need as its doubled to 4
User avatar
Truscott Trotter
Posts: 8788
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 11:11 pm
Location: Tasmania the Southernmost CoC in the world

Re: Vehicle Flame Throwers

Post by Truscott Trotter »

No he's talking about receiving not giving
Post Reply