Search found 3889 matches

by Seret
Mon Sep 23, 2019 10:42 am
Forum: Chain of Command
Topic: They Don't Make Tanks Like That Any More
Replies: 3
Views: 34

Re: They Don't Make Tanks Like That Any More

There's a reason they don't make tanks like that any more...

I'm inclined to not let multi-turret tanks have any special rules to make them more uber. After all, they weren't uber.
by Seret
Sat Sep 21, 2019 2:52 pm
Forum: Chain of Command
Topic: soviet support LIST
Replies: 5
Views: 136

Re: soviet support LIST

100% typo. There's a few odd bits in the Soviet list in the book TBH, it's a bit rough around the edges.
by Seret
Tue Sep 17, 2019 7:50 am
Forum: Chain of Command
Topic: Campaign query
Replies: 10
Views: 316

Re: Campaign query

As long as they only suffer one wound they come back in the next campaign turn. If they're wounded twice they have to sit out one turn.
by Seret
Tue Sep 17, 2019 6:43 am
Forum: Chain of Command
Topic: Selecting British Airborne Section with 2 LMGs from Support list?
Replies: 24
Views: 514

Re: Selecting British Airborne Section with 2 LMGs from Support list?

The problem I foresee is the coculator costs out the basic core platoon differently than the support points cost. It also can't be used at all to cost infantry squads and teams. The CoCulator works out the costs of whole platoons, vehicles and towed guns. It can't work out the cost of individual sq...
by Seret
Sun Sep 15, 2019 8:45 am
Forum: Chain of Command
Topic: Selecting British Airborne Section with 2 LMGs from Support list?
Replies: 24
Views: 514

Re: Selecting British Airborne Section with 2 LMGs from Support list?

And the third sniper, and the other two 2" mortars? Para sections were all equipped identically and had one Bren, a 2" mortar, a No.4T scoped rifle, three Stens and five No.4s. Platoon HQ was just a couple of bodies with no PIAT. Obviously that's quite unusual compared to a rifle platoon and you hav...
by Seret
Sun Sep 15, 2019 8:14 am
Forum: Chain of Command
Topic: Selecting British Airborne Section with 2 LMGs from Support list?
Replies: 24
Views: 514

Re: Selecting British Airborne Section with 2 LMGs from Support list?

Para sections only ever had one Been gun allocated to them. The platoon had a fourth gun, which the platoon commander could use at their discretion, but Rich had decided in his list to have it permanently with the third section. I think that's an unusual decision, because platoons of other nations a...
by Seret
Sat Sep 14, 2019 12:43 pm
Forum: Chain of Command
Topic: Pre Game Sequence
Replies: 23
Views: 652

Re: Pre Game Sequence

Personally I'd like to do both. I think flamethrowers are way too good in CoC. If you were going to play super competitively you'd always take one. IMO they should be great at dealing with structures and fortifications, and a bit rubbish in a stand-up fight. I don't think it's a case of "changing th...
by Seret
Sat Sep 14, 2019 12:03 pm
Forum: Chain of Command
Topic: Pre Game Sequence
Replies: 23
Views: 652

Re: Pre Game Sequence

2.

It's clearly exploiting a loophole in the support system. If you want two flamethrowers, pay the support points for both of them.
by Seret
Sat Sep 14, 2019 7:32 am
Forum: Chain of Command
Topic: Pre Game Sequence
Replies: 23
Views: 652

Re: Pre Game Sequence

Truscott Trotter wrote:
Fri Sep 13, 2019 7:58 pm
Not wasted IMHO you choose flamers
Flamer. Choosing two in an engineering section is super cheesy.
by Seret
Fri Sep 13, 2019 8:54 am
Forum: Chain of Command
Topic: Pre Game Sequence
Replies: 23
Views: 652

Re: Pre Game Sequence

Of course the issue is where and when should Stukas should go as this needs to be bought with 4 x Support Points. Sure, but there's no reason you have to allocate all the rest of your support points at that stage. If the German player wants to Stuka the board up, do that before the patrol phase, pl...